Skip to content

Actions: apache/datafusion

Actions

All workflows

Actions

Loading...
Loading

Showing runs from all workflows
2,500+ workflow runs
2,500+ workflow runs

Filter by Workflow

⌥ + click/return to exclude

Filter by Event

⌥ + click/return to exclude

Filter by Status

⌥ + click/return to exclude

Filter by Branch

⌥ + click/return to exclude

Filter by Actor

⌥ + click/return to exclude
refactor: use raw view access in do_append_val_inner and consolidate duplicated logic Assign/unassign the issue via `take` or `untake` comment #51509: Issue comment #22907 (comment) created by adriangbot
12s
12s
refactor: use raw view access in do_append_val_inner and consolidate duplicated logic Assign/unassign the issue via `take` or `untake` comment #51508: Issue comment #22907 (comment) created by adriangbot
1s
1s
refactor: use raw view access in do_append_val_inner and consolidate duplicated logic Assign/unassign the issue via `take` or `untake` comment #51507: Issue comment #22907 (comment) created by adriangbot
1s
1s
Support non-equijoin filters for existence-probe + RightSemi Assign/unassign the issue via `take` or `untake` comment #51506: Issue comment #22928 (comment) created by neilconway
10s
10s
refactor: use raw view access in do_append_val_inner and consolidate duplicated logic Assign/unassign the issue via `take` or `untake` comment #51505: Issue comment #22907 (comment) created by adriangbot
7s
7s
refactor: use raw view access in do_append_val_inner and consolidate duplicated logic Assign/unassign the issue via `take` or `untake` comment #51504: Issue comment #22907 (comment) created by adriangbot
1s
1s
refactor: use raw view access in do_append_val_inner and consolidate duplicated logic Assign/unassign the issue via `take` or `untake` comment #51503: Issue comment #22907 (comment) created by adriangbot
1s
1s
refactor: use raw view access in do_append_val_inner and consolidate duplicated logic Assign/unassign the issue via `take` or `untake` comment #51502: Issue comment #22907 (comment) created by alamb
1s
1s
Fix round() precision loss and errors for large Int64/UInt64 values Rust #68211: Pull request #22927 opened by greedAuguria
Action required greedAuguria:fix-round-large-int64-uint64
greedAuguria:fix-round-large-int64-uint64
Action required
Fix round() precision loss and errors for large Int64/UInt64 values Detect breaking changes #2693: Pull request #22927 opened by greedAuguria
Action required greedAuguria:fix-round-large-int64-uint64
greedAuguria:fix-round-large-int64-uint64
Action required
Fix round() precision loss and errors for large Int64/UInt64 values Large files PR check #33009: Pull request #22927 opened by greedAuguria
Action required greedAuguria:fix-round-large-int64-uint64
greedAuguria:fix-round-large-int64-uint64
Action required
Fix round() precision loss and errors for large Int64/UInt64 values Dependencies #13240: Pull request #22927 opened by greedAuguria
Action required greedAuguria:fix-round-large-int64-uint64
greedAuguria:fix-round-large-int64-uint64
Action required
Fix round() precision loss and errors for large Int64/UInt64 values CodeQL #7755: Pull request #22927 opened by greedAuguria
Action required greedAuguria:fix-round-large-int64-uint64
greedAuguria:fix-round-large-int64-uint64
Action required
Fix round() precision loss and errors for large Int64/UInt64 values Dev #70269: Pull request #22927 opened by greedAuguria
Action required greedAuguria:fix-round-large-int64-uint64
greedAuguria:fix-round-large-int64-uint64
Action required
Fix round() precision loss and errors for large Int64/UInt64 values Labeler #27481: Pull request #22927 opened by greedAuguria
11s
11s
Adaptive (runtime, stats-based) conjunct reordering for FilterExec Assign/unassign the issue via `take` or `untake` comment #51501: Issue comment #22698 (comment) created by adriangbot
2s
2s
Detect breaking changes - Comment Detect breaking changes - Comment #2355: completed by theirix
11s
11s
Adaptive (runtime, stats-based) conjunct reordering for FilterExec Assign/unassign the issue via `take` or `untake` comment #51500: Issue comment #22698 (comment) created by adriangbot
11s
11s
Detect breaking changes - Comment Detect breaking changes - Comment #2354: completed by theirix
10s
10s
feat: decimal support for gcd and lcm CodeQL #7754: Pull request #22655 synchronize by theirix
1m 53s theirix:gcd-lcm-decimal
theirix:gcd-lcm-decimal
1m 53s
feat: decimal support for gcd and lcm Rust #68210: Pull request #22655 synchronize by theirix
21m 49s theirix:gcd-lcm-decimal
theirix:gcd-lcm-decimal
21m 49s
feat: decimal support for gcd and lcm Large files PR check #33008: Pull request #22655 synchronize by theirix
40s theirix:gcd-lcm-decimal
theirix:gcd-lcm-decimal
40s
feat: decimal support for gcd and lcm Detect breaking changes #2692: Pull request #22655 synchronize by theirix
3m 35s theirix:gcd-lcm-decimal
theirix:gcd-lcm-decimal
3m 35s
feat: decimal support for gcd and lcm Dev #70268: Pull request #22655 synchronize by theirix
1m 42s theirix:gcd-lcm-decimal
theirix:gcd-lcm-decimal
1m 42s
feat: decimal support for gcd and lcm Dependencies #13239: Pull request #22655 synchronize by theirix
4m 25s theirix:gcd-lcm-decimal
theirix:gcd-lcm-decimal
4m 25s