Skip to content

Add SHOW RECEIVERS support#17869

Draft
Caideyipi wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
feat/show-receivers
Draft

Add SHOW RECEIVERS support#17869
Caideyipi wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
feat/show-receivers

Conversation

@Caideyipi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

  • add tree-model SHOW RECEIVERS and table-model information_schema.receivers support
  • track active pipe receiver sessions, sender endpoints, pipe IDs, handshake/transfer timestamps, and request counts
  • wire DataNode/ConfigNode thrift and air-gap receiver runtime recording

Tests

  • mvn "-Ddevelocity.off=true" -pl iotdb-core/node-commons -Dtest=PipeReceiverRuntimeRegistryTest test
  • mvn "-Ddevelocity.off=true" -DskipTests compile -pl iotdb-core/antlr,iotdb-core/relational-grammar,iotdb-core/node-commons,iotdb-core/confignode
  • mvn "-Ddevelocity.off=true" -DskipTests spotless:check -pl iotdb-core/node-commons,iotdb-core/datanode,iotdb-core/confignode,iotdb-core/relational-grammar,iotdb-core/antlr
  • git diff --check

Notes

  • DataNode focused compile is still blocked by unrelated generated Freemarker/calc symbols such as IFill, LinearFill, Accumulator, ComparatorChain, and IoTDBConfig.getModeMapSizeThreshold().
  • ConfigNode receiver records proxied through DataNode use receiver_node_id = -1 because the current proxy path does not expose the exact target ConfigNode id.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant